<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Computing &#8211; Risk &amp; Reward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogit.dslee.org/2010/07/21/cloud-computing-risk-reward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogit.dslee.org/2010/07/21/cloud-computing-risk-reward/</link>
	<description>IP on everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Charland</title>
		<link>http://blogit.dslee.org/2010/07/21/cloud-computing-risk-reward/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Charland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dsleeman.wordpress.com/2010/07/21/cloud-computing-risk-reward/#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your line of thinking. Tech people who say, &quot;we never have problems&quot; need...ummm...education.

That said, it&#039;s unfortunate that [software vendor pretending to be a cloud service provider] isn&#039;t more distinguishable from someone who&#039;s doing it right. [cloud service provider]&#039;s product is simply a hosted application that is housed in a single data center on a single rack of application servers.

WE know that&#039;s not &quot;true cloud&quot; where you have distributed storage and power a la s3 or even a distributed application like the 10,000 e-commerce sites that can withstand a data center outage.

Problem is, the average business owner trusts the [software vendor who wants to be a cloud service provider] name and figures, &quot;if THEY can&#039;t do it right, who can?&quot;

Even Microsoft had some serious issues with their Office Live Small Business service...made us ask, &quot;Would Microsoft do something this stupid?&quot;

Maybe that&#039;s part of the business model. Undermine trust in the hosted app to make people still buy the desktop product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your line of thinking. Tech people who say, &#8220;we never have problems&#8221; need&#8230;ummm&#8230;education.</p>
<p>That said, it&#8217;s unfortunate that [software vendor pretending to be a cloud service provider] isn&#8217;t more distinguishable from someone who&#8217;s doing it right. [cloud service provider]&#8216;s product is simply a hosted application that is housed in a single data center on a single rack of application servers.</p>
<p>WE know that&#8217;s not &#8220;true cloud&#8221; where you have distributed storage and power a la s3 or even a distributed application like the 10,000 e-commerce sites that can withstand a data center outage.</p>
<p>Problem is, the average business owner trusts the [software vendor who wants to be a cloud service provider] name and figures, &#8220;if THEY can&#8217;t do it right, who can?&#8221;</p>
<p>Even Microsoft had some serious issues with their Office Live Small Business service&#8230;made us ask, &#8220;Would Microsoft do something this stupid?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s part of the business model. Undermine trust in the hosted app to make people still buy the desktop product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

